|
An event regarding crack/fracture involving a triathlon baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed by product inspection.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 25-oct-2019.This inspection indicated there was damage consistent with the implantation/explantation process and burnishing was observed on the main baseplate body fracture surface.Material evaluation was completed and indicated the following comments: striations consistent with fatigue fracture were observed on the baseplate fracture surface.The approximate fracture origin occurred at multiple sites on the proximal surface and propagated to the distal surface.Based on the given information, no identifiable material or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: ¿no clinical or past medical history, no examination of explanted components, and no prerevision x-rays of the left knee are available.In this very large male patient, the description of a cystic lesion below the posteromedial tibial component likely resulted in cyclic loading at the junction of the unsupported portion of the tibial component with the ingrown portion, leading to inevitable fatigue fracture.Examination of the explanted components would confirm this mechanism and rule out factors associated with implant design, manufacturing or materials.¿ device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: a clinician review of the provided medical records states the following; no clinical or past medical history, no examination of explanted components, and no prerevision x-rays of the left knee are available.In this very large male patient, the description of a cystic lesion below the posteromedial tibial component likely resulted in cyclic loading at the junction of the unsupported portion of the tibial component with the ingrown portion, leading to inevitable fatigue fracture.Examination of the explanted components would confirm this mechanism and rule out factors associated with implant design, manufacturing or materials.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, clinical reports, and pre-revision x-rays are needed to fully investigate the event.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|