|
An event regarding crack/fracture involving a triathlon insert was reported.Material analysis of the returned device confirmed the event.Method & results product evaluation and results: visual inspection of the returned device was performed as part of mar dated 31-oct-2019 and noted the following: scratching was observed on the articulating surface of both condyles consistent with articulation against the femoral component.Scratching,burnishing, and third body indentations were observed on the articulating surface; these are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Scratching and damage consistent with contact against a hard object was observed on the articulating surface of the medial condyle in two locations.Beach marks were observed on the fractured post indicating that it fractured in fatigue.Impression markings consistent with contact against the baseplate were observed on the distal surface.Damage was observed on the distal and anterior surfaces consistent with damage from the explantation process.Additionally, debris was observed on the distal surface and was further analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (sem).Material analysis of the returned device concluded the following: the tibial post fractured in fatigue.Damage was observed on the articulating surface of the medial condyle consistent with contact against a hard object.Scratching, burnishing, and third body indentations were observed on the articulating surface of both condyles; these are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Beach marks were observed on the fractured post, consistent with fatigue fracture.Damage was observed on the distal and anterior surface consistent with damage from the explantation process.Imbedded debris was observed on the distal surface in two locations.The eds data showed the debris from location 1 was consistent with a 400 series stainless steel alloy, biological material, and an unknown material.The eds data showed the debris from location 2 was consistent with biological material and the decontamination process.Based on the given information, no identifiable material or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: no clinical or past medical history, no examination of explanted components, and no dated serial x-rays of the involved left knee are available.After seven years in situ in this morbidly obese patient, any ligamentous instability would have cyclically loaded the ps insert post resulting in inevitable fatigue fracture.Examination of the fracture surfaces could confirm this mechanism and rule out factors associated with implant manufacturing or materials as related to this clinical event.Product history review: a review of the device manufacturing records indicate that all devices accepted into final stock were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: no clinical or past medical history, no examination of explanted components, and no dated serial x-rays of the involved left knee are available.After seven years in situ in this morbidly obese patient, any ligamentous instability would have cyclically loaded the ps insert post resulting in inevitable fatigue fracture.Examination of the fracture surfaces could confirm this mechanism and rule out factors associated with implant manufacturing or materials as related to this clinical event.The device was returned and material analysis carried out.Material analysis of the returned device concluded the following: the tibial post fractured in fatigue.Damage was observed on the articulating surface of the medial condyle consistent with contact against a hard object.Scratching, burnishing, and third body indentations were observed on the articulating surface of both condyles; these are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Beach marks were observed on the fractured post, consistent with fatigue fracture.Damage was observed on the distal and anterior surface consistent with damage from the explantation process.Imbedded debris was observed on the distal surface in two locations.The eds data showed the debris from location 1 was consistent with a 400 series stainless steel alloy, biological material, and an unknown material.The eds data showed the debris from location 2 was consistent with biological material and the decontamination process.Based on the given information, no identifiable material or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.
|