| Catalog Number |
CDF10030830 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Separation Failure (2547)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
08/29/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Procode: krd/hcg.Initial reporter: the customer contact information, including name, occupation, phone, fax, and e-mail address, was not reported.Manufacturing site name: codman and shurtleff inc., dba depuy synthes products, inc.(b)(4).The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by a healthcare professional, during a coil embolization, when the physician tried to detach a 3mmx8cm deltapaq cere coil (cdf10030830, s11444) the beeping sound was normal but during the retrieving delivery system, it continuously came out along the delivery system.The physician used a same like product.The procedure was successfully finished.There was no patient injury reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: as reported by a healthcare professional, during a coil embolization, when the physician tried to detach a 3mmx8cm deltapaq cere coil (cdf10030830, (b)(4) the beeping sound was normal but during the retrieving delivery system, it continuously came out along the delivery system.The physician used a same like product.The procedure was successfully finished.There was no patient injury reported.One non-sterile unit deltapaq cere 3mmx8cm was received inside of a pouch.The hub was inspected, and no damages was noted on it.The dpu was inspected and it was found in good conditions.The introducer was inspected, and it was found partially zipped and kinked.The re-sheathing tool was inspected, and it was found in good conditions.The v-notch was inspected under microscope and no damages were noted on it.The rh was inspected under microscope and it was found in good conditions.The embolic coil was inspected under microscope and no damages was noted on it.The resistance of the received device was measured with multimeter and lab sample enpower control cable.Resistance initially measured approximately 52.0 o, which is in of the specification range between 48.5 o ¿ 56.0 o.Then a lab sample enpower control cable was connected to deltapaq cere 2mmx6cm and then connected to the detachment control box and the power was turned on.The system ready light illuminated.A detachment cycle was initiated when the detach button was pressed.After that the embolic coil was detached from the device.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device s11444 number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The complaint reported by the customer ¿coil ¿ failure to detach¿ was not confirm due on the functional test the embolic coil was detached from the device.Neither the analysis nor the mre suggest that the failure reported by the costumer could be related to the manufacturing process.Failure to detach is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) contains several precautions related to this issue and includes instructions for troubleshooting the situation should it be encountered during use.Based on the limited information available for review, it is possible that procedural and handling factors may have contributed to the reported event.Multiple attempts to obtain additional information were unsuccessful.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|