• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DIAGNOSTICA STAGO S.A.S. STA-R MAX; IVD COAGULATION DEVICE/INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DIAGNOSTICA STAGO S.A.S. STA-R MAX; IVD COAGULATION DEVICE/INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 59010
Medical Device Problem Code Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 09/04/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
A customer (cpl - sonic) called the stago north america hotline on (b)(6) 2019 to report a bias of -100% on stago 1 (s/n (b)(4)) vs.Stago 2 (s/n (b)(4)) for protein c testing.The pc-20 results from (b)(6) 2018 until (b)(6) 2019 on stago 1 (s/n (b)(4)) were recovering approximately half of expected levels due to an incorrect dilution factor setting.The cause of the incorrect setting is still under investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
A customer (cpl - sonic) called the stago north america hotline on (b)(6) 2019 to report a bias of -100% on stago 1 (s/n (b)(4)) vs.Stago 2 (s/n (b)(4)) for protein c testing.The pc-20 results from 19jul2018 until 06sep2019 on stago 1 (s/n (b)(4)) were recovering approximately half of expected levels due to an incorrect dilution factor setting.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: the instrument (stago 1) was evaluated by both a field support engineer (fse) and a technical support specialist (tss).The sta r max instrument was found to be within stago specifications and in good working order.However, an incorrect dilution "correction" factor was discovered for the pc-20 test.This corrector was set to 1 on stago 1 when it should have been 2.This was corrected immediately by the tss.Additionally, middleware data was reviewed by technical experts in the us and the advanced support team at the french manufacturing site reviewed system tracking files, and laboratory information system data provided by the customer.Findings: diagnostica stago has concluded that pc-20 results from 19jul2018 until 06sep2019 were recovering approximately half of expected levels due to the incorrect dilution factor.Root cause: the cause of the pc-20 result issue was an incorrect dilution "correction" factor setting on stago 1.Sna suspects that there was a setting error that originated by human error when stago and customer representatives met in person on (b)(6) 2018.Stago could not definitively confirm this suspected root cause, in part due to the fact that one of the persons directly involved in the meetings is no longer a stago employee and therefore could not be interviewed.Status of the complaint: patient impact : we have no information about patient impact in this case, but we have to presume that these erroneous results could lead to incorrect treatment.Conclusion : we have concluded our investigations into this event.Please note that a vigilance will be added in the user manuals (sta-r max, sta compact max, sta satellite max) to avoid the problem : user methodology must be validated before releasing results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STA-R MAX
Common Device Name
IVD COAGULATION DEVICE/INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
DIAGNOSTICA STAGO S.A.S.
3 allée theresa
asnières-sur-seine, 92600
FR  92600
MDR Report Key9158233
Report Number2245451-2019-00009
Device Sequence Number11243903
Product Code JPA
UDI-Device Identifier03607450590104
UDI-Public(01)03607450590104(11)18092015(241)59010
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Importer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/04/2019
Report Date (Section F) 10/04/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number59010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Device Age4 YR
Event Location Other
Date Report to Manufacturer10/04/2019
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/04/2019
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/14/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Date Report Sent to FDA10/04/2019
-
-