|
|
| Catalog Number |
02-010-04-0335 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Information (3190); Joint Laxity (4526); Muscle/Tendon Damage (4532)
|
| Date of Event |
09/13/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revised due to instability ¿ ruptured posterior cruciate ligament (pcl), revised to hinge.The patient was stable as they left the operating room.There was no delay to the surgery.The rep was present at the time of the surgery.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: (h3) the clinical evaluation noted the device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.There is no indication that there is a device related problem, there is no allegation against the device.The most likely cause of the reported event, instability/subluxation, is related to the underlying patient condition of ruptured posterior cruciate ligament (pcl).(d11) concomitant devices: - tibial inserts cr cn; 02-012-47-3509 / sn; (b)(6) - fit tibial tray (cn: 02-012-45-3525 / sn: (b)(6).- three peg patella, 32mm cn: 200-02-32 / sn: (b)(6).No information provided in the following section(s): a2, a3, a4, a5, b6, and b7.The following section(s) have additional info: b5, g4, g7, h1, h2, h3, and h7.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and corrected information.The following sections were updated: h6 the following sections were corrected: b5 - please disregard product information, no informaiton available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this patient's left knee was revised due to instability.Patient had a ruptured posterior cruciate ligament (pcl), revised to hinge.The patient suffers from right knee aggravation.The knee and lumbar spine aggravation are consequential to the right knee with ongoing impairment.The patient was stable as they left the operating room.There was no delay to the surgery.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: h6, h11.H11: the reported event was unable to be confirmed due to limited information received from the customer.No device was returned for evaluation; further, photographs and/or radiograph images were not provided for review.Operative notes and/or medical records were not provided for review of usage/ technique.A review of complaint history determined that no further action is required as no trends were identified.A definitive root cause was unable to be determined; however, it may be due to a traumatic event/injury, soft tissue imbalance, patient anatomy, implant positioning, and/or implant selection.However, the failure could not be confirmed because the devices were not returned for evaluation, and relevant patient information, images, or radiographs were not provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|