|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A review of the device history record.Device history lot : part number: 314.29.Synthes lot number: 4025890.Supplier lot number: n/a.Release to warehouse date: 01 nov 1999.Expiration date: n/a.Manufactured by synthes brandywine.No ncrs were generated during production.Device history batch null, device history review review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Investigation summary background: it was reported that during sterile processing on september 24, 2019, the handle of a cannulated hexagonal screwdriver was found broken.There was no patient involvement.This complaint involves one (1) device.Investigation flow: damage.Visual inspection: cannulated 2.5mm hexagonal screwdriver was received at us cq.Upon visual inspection at cq, it is observed that the handle of the device has a vertical crack.The rest of the device shows normal wear consistent with the device use which would not contribute to the complaint condition.Thus, the complaint is confirmed.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection of the relevant features cannot be performed due to post manufacturing damage.Document/specification review: no design issues were found which can contribute to this complaint condition.Investigation conclusion: a visual inspection, and document/specification review were performed as part of this investigation.The device was observed to be having a cracked handle.Thus, the complaint is confirmed.While a definitive root cause could not be identified, it is possible that the repeated usage of the device over 20 years might have contributed to the complaint condition.No product design or manufacturing issues were identified, and no new malfunctions were identified either.Based upon these results, no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|