|
Other relevant device(s) are: product id: vnmf4040c103tu, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 07-apr-2021, udi#: (b)(4); product id: vnmf4646c183tu, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 15-nov-2020, udi#: (b)(4) ; product id: vamc4242c150tu, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 12-feb-2020, udi#: (b)(4) ; product id: vamc4646b100tu, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 08-nov-2019, udi#: (b)(4).Film evaluation summary: the reported area of contrast noted near the proximal end of the device, which appeared to have resolved after implanting additional devices proximally, was confirmed.It is possible that this loss of seal may have contributed to expansion of the taa.The cause could not be determined.The anatomy at implant is unknown, earlier post-implant films were not available for review, and images during the recent tevar intervention were also not provided.It is possible that the loss of proximal seal was due to disease progression.It is also possible that the need to extend the devices distally and secure with endoanchors may have been caused by disease progression.The cause of the reported stroke also could not be determined.It is possible that this may have been procedure related during implant of the left carotid to left subclavian bypass, coiling of the lsa, and/or recent tevar, or related to a patient issue.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|