• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. BD PHOENIX¿ NMIC-300; FULLY AUTOMATED SHORT TERM INCUBATION AST

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. BD PHOENIX¿ NMIC-300; FULLY AUTOMATED SHORT TERM INCUBATION AST Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 448871
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem Test Result (2695)
Event Date 09/19/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
The customer reported a discrepant result while using the bd phoenix nmic panel.The panel result was 8/4 (s) to amp/sulbactam for acinetobacter baumanii.The tech forgot that the amp/sulbactam was on the panel and a kb was set up.The kb result was intermediate.The nmic-300 panel was repeated since there was discrepancy between the phoenix panel and the k/b.The repeat phoenix result was greater than 16/8 (r).The patient was sent home on amp/sulbactam since it was originally reported as susceptible.The customer is unable to provide any additional information.
 
Event Description
The customer reported a discrepant result while using the bd phoenix¿ nmic panel.The panel result was 8/4 (s) to amp/sulbactam for acinetobacter baumanii.The tech forgot that the amp/sulbactam was on the panel and a kb was set up.The kb result was intermediate.The nmic-300 panel was repeated since there was discrepancy between the phoenix panel and the k/b.The repeat phoenix result was >16/8 (r).The patient was sent home on amp/sulbactam since it was originally reported as susceptible.The customer is unable to provide any additional information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: this complaint is for false susceptibility of acinetobacter baumanii to ampicillin/sulbactam when using phoenix panel nmic 300 (448871) batch number not provided.Investigational testing included testing four qc isolates on a phoenix 100 to evaluate panel performance per package insert.Atcc 25922, atcc 35218, atcc 700603 and atcc 27853 were used to evaluate mic values, growth control, and esbl summary against internal qc release criteria and package inserts.All four qc isolates yielded expected results per internal qc criteria and package insert.This complaint could not be confirmed.It is to be noted that the customer reported they found it to no longer be an issue.No further information was provided or obtained regarding this no longer being an issue.The complaint investigation also included complaint trending and no complaint trends exist for this defect (false susceptibility of acinetobacter baumanii to ampicillin/sulbactam).Bd id/ast plant quality will continue to closely monitor for trends and take appropriate action as necessary.This complaint was not confirmed.Root cause was not determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX¿ NMIC-300
Type of Device
FULLY AUTOMATED SHORT TERM INCUBATION AST
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO.
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
MDR Report Key9193644
MDR Text Key173228032
Report Number1119779-2019-00116
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LON
UDI-Device Identifier30382904488711
UDI-Public30382904488711
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K071623
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other,user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number448871
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2019
Initial Date FDA Received10/15/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/19/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/27/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-