• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EBI, LLC. SPINALPAK STIMULATOR, BIOMET; STIMULATOR, BONE GROWTH, NON-INVASIVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EBI, LLC. SPINALPAK STIMULATOR, BIOMET; STIMULATOR, BONE GROWTH, NON-INVASIVE Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Medical Device Problem Code Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Code Available (3191)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimmer biomet complaint (b)(4).The event occurred sometime in (b)(6) 2019.Concomitant medical products: medical product: c5-6 and c6-7 titanium cages and anterior plate; therapy date: 2012.The customer has indicated that the product is in the process of being returned to zimmer biomet for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.Device has not been returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the spinalpak stimulator was causing the patient's heart rate to increase.The patient stated that his heart rate increased to over 100 and would only reach that level when he was wearing the spinalpak stimulator.He reached out to his cardiologist and the ordering doctor to discuss his symptoms and both advised him to stop using the unit.No additional patient consequences were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The device was returned to zimmer biomet for investigation.No physical and/or device functional condition could be found that could be considered a causal factor for the reported complaint.The device operated/functioned as intended.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no discrepancies were found.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.The following sections were updated: h3: device evaluated by manufacturer updated to yes.H6: method code updated to 3331: analysis of production records.H6: method code updated to 10: testing of actual/suspected device.H6: results code updated to 213: no device problem found.H6: conclusions code updated to 4315: cause not established.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the spinalpak stimulator was causing the patient's heart rate to increase.The patient stated that his heart rate increased to over 100 and would only reach that level when he was wearing the spinalpak stimulator.He reached out to his cardiologist and the ordering doctor to discuss his symptoms and both advised him to stop using the unit.No additional patient consequences were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPINALPAK STIMULATOR, BIOMET
Common Device Name
STIMULATOR, BONE GROWTH, NON-INVASIVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EBI, LLC.
399 jefferson road
parsippany NJ 07054
MDR Report Key9218004
Report Number0002242816-2019-00032
Device Sequence Number11472253
Product Code LOF
UDI-Device Identifier00812301020225
UDI-Public00812301020225
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P850022
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/31/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number1067717
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/30/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/09/2019
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/28/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/22/2019
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/31/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
N/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H10
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Weight98
-
-