• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG SHUNTASSISTANT 20; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG SHUNTASSISTANT 20; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV251T
Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 09/27/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Height: 130cm.When additional information becomes available, a follow up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the valve over drained.The reporter indicated that a 6 year post-operative valve is over draining and required explantation.Additional details of the event is not available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Adjustment test: this is a fixed pressure valve.An adjustment test is not applicable.Braking force and brake function test: this is a fixed pressure valve.A braking force and brake function test is not applicable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over/under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus, which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valve operates within the accepted tolerance in vertical positions.Results: first, we performed a visual inspection of the shunt assistant.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Next, we tested the permeability of the valve.The valve was shown to be permeable.Then we carried out a computer controlled simulated flow test.The measured opening pressure was within the accepted tolerance.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Inside the valve, we have found a build-up of substances (likely protein).Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of over-drainage.At the time of our investigation, the opening pressure of the shunt assistant valve was within the specified tolerances.However, it is possible that the deposits observed inside the valve could have caused the malfunction in the past.As described in our literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SHUNTASSISTANT 20
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM  14469
MDR Report Key9219042
MDR Text Key163176676
Report Number3004721439-2019-00257
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K161853
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/22/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2017
Device Model NumberFV251T
Device Catalogue NumberFV251T
Device Lot Number4505187585
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/30/2019
Date Manufacturer Received10/11/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
Patient Weight25
-
-