| Model Number |
1181200777 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
10/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The incident sample has been requested but to date has not been received for evaluation.If the sample is received, or if additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported a broken flange.Additional information received from the cardinal health sales representative stated that when the physician was doing an emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (tips) procedure, the syringe flange broke during a hand injection for venogram.The broken edge of the syringe tore through physician 's bloody glove and cut through his skin.The patient was known (b)(6).The patient was (b)(6).He has (b)(6) by (b)(6) testing.Currently, the status of (b)(6) is unknown.The physician broke the scrub, cleaned his wound and continued to complete the case.After the procedure, the physician went to the emergency department for post exposure testing.Blood was drawn.Dtap, (b)(6) (4 shots) were received.Approximately 3 hours were spent in the emergency room (er).Cdc/ucsf physician hotline was contacted for assistance.The physician is currently doing well.The physician has been instructed to get (b)(6) count testing in 6 weeks and (b)(6) testing in 24 weeks.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date of the event: (b)(64) 2019.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Because a lot number was not provided, the device history record could not be performed.As part of our manufacturing process, all device history records are reviewed and approved by quality, prior to release of the product.One sample was received for the evaluation.The sample was not in its original packaging and did not include traceability to which lot number or mold cavity it came from nor the expiration date.Without a lot number, it cannot be confirmed that the syringe was within the defined expiration period.Upon evaluation of the received sample, the reported condition is confirmed.During sample investigation, no other damage to the syringe was observed aside from acceptable scuff marks underneath the finger flange which were present along the entire circumference.Scuff marks are not uncommon as the syringe travels on this portion of the barrel during manufacturing.Breakage appeared to have occurred due to force in the downward direction based on break angle.This is opposite to the force expected to be applied during use conditions.A control sample was evaluated from the same part number.Approximately 45 lbf was applied to the finger flange in the downward direction before breakage occurred.This is an excessive amount of force which is not expected during use conditions.The sample was then reviewed to confirm breakage direction.Break angle was similar to that in the sample returned.Based on sample evaluation, it is highly likely that the barrel finger flange was damaged with excessive force (to some extent) prior to use.The broken off piece was not returned for evaluation.We are unable to determine if the received sample met original specifications.The method of root cause analysis implemented in this investigation was to conduct a six m assessment that evaluated potential causes.In the event where an issue originated during manufacturing, the most probable root cause of the reported condition is likely a mechanical jam occurring at the assembly machine¿s infeed station which was not properly removed from the process.Based on the information available and the investigation findings, standard work has been put in place to direct operators on how to manage jams on the assembly machine to ensure proper removal.If additional information is received warranting further analysis, the investigation will be resumed.This complaint will be used for tracking and trending purposes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record was unable to be performed because the lot number provided is not a valid lot number.As part of our manufacturing process, all device history records are reviewed and approved by quality, prior to the release of product.A lot will not be released unless all acceptance criteria inspections per established sampling levels are within acceptable limits.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information d 4: added lot number.G 3: added medwatch number.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|