• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB SERVO-U; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB SERVO-U; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number SERVO-U
Device Problem Pressure Problem (3012)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to a blog publication, a patient in icu for 8 months was on occasions treated with nava.In the blog it is alleged that the patient could have taken bigger breaths causing her diaphragm to have a greater contraction, leading to high inspiratory pressures and high volumes causing damage and inflammation to her lungs.The family requested discontinuation of life support and the patient was let pass away after bringing her home.No indication of a product malfunction.Manufacturer ref #: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The hospital had no additional information to provide in the matter.There was no complaint submitted by the hospital.The information available was therefore the blog narrative.According to the blog narrative, the patient was in icu for 8 months and treated with ventilatory therapy in various ventilation modes that also included the nava (neurally adjusted ventilatory assist) mode of ventilation.The narrative does not specify given ventilation periods in the various ventilations modes and their resulting effectiveness covering the entire period of 8 months.According to the narrative, there were many issues with patient during the 8 months resulting in administration with many different types of medications, sedations and cpr among others.The allegation that the patient could have taken bigger breaths causing her diaphragm to have a greater contraction, leading to high inspiratory pressures and high volumes causing damage and inflammation to her lungs with the available information cannot be confirmed.Ventilatory patient treatment is done by healthcare professionals who continuously adapt the ventilator¿s modes of ventilation, parameter settings and alarm limits according to the patient needs during treatment.There is nothing in the narrative that indicate any ventilator malfunction during the 8 months treatment.On the contrary the narrative states that the all the doctors¿ assessments of the case found no cause.There is nothing in the narrative that indicate any ventilator malfunction during the 8 months treatment.On the contrary the narrative states that the all the doctors¿ assessments of the case found no cause.H3 other text : no further information received.
 
Event Description
Manufacturer's ref.#: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SERVO-U
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB
roentgenvagen 2
solna
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB
roentgenvagen 2
solna
Manufacturer Contact
sara soderholm roman
roentgenvagen 2
solna 
MDR Report Key9239467
MDR Text Key177788099
Report Number3013876692-2019-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSERVO-U
Device Catalogue Number6694800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA12/07/2021
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/06/2021
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer12/07/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/25/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/06/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/07/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age8 MO
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight1 KG
-
-