|
(b)(4).An opened box with eleven samples of product y845, lot # pcz041 were returned for analysis.During the visual inspection of eleven unopened samples, no defects were found on the packages.The samples were opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no defects, damaged or suture breakage were noted.A functional test was performed and the tensile strength force was above the minimum requirement.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.Per the condition of the representative samples, no breakage suture was found and the tested samples met the finished goods requirements.A suture neede (sample b) was returned for evaluation.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment sample b.One needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surface was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surface and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surface was examined in multiple locations in order to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4) revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.Mechanical damage and macroscopic plastic deformation observed coincidental to the fracture provide additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the attachment area of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.
|