| Catalog Number |
0117312 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #1) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did allege surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol perfix plug (device #2).Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light mesh (device #1) or an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug (device #2) on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol 3dmax light mesh (device #1) and the perfix plug (device #2).As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made regarding the bard/davol 3dmax light (device # 1) used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did allege surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.This emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax light (device # 1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol perfix plug (device # 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light mesh (device # 1) or an unspecified bard/davol perfix plug (device # 2) on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol 3dmax light mesh (device # 1) and the perfix plug (device # 2).As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix plug (device #1).Per operative notes, "the hernia was noted and reduced.A perfix plug was placed and tacked to the floor.An onlay patch was tacked to pubic tubercle." on (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal pain and bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with the implant of 3dmax light meshes (device # 2, # 3), resection of nerve and removal of mesh (device # 1).Per operative notes, "the nerves were entrapped beneath the mesh.The previous mesh (device # 1) was removed completely.Two 3dmax light meshes (device # 2, # 3) were placed on both sides ad sutured.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|