• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 45007
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384); Difficult to Remove (1528); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/16/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: (b)(6).Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis consisted of a jetstream xc 2.4mm atherectomy catheter.The device was visually examined and it was noticed that there was shaft damage in the form of buckling/kinks located at 126cm from the tip proximal.The infusion line had burst proximal the buckling/kinks, located approximately 5cm to 16cm from the tip.Functional testing was unable to be performed due a severely damaged of the sheath.The damage that was noticed was consistent with sheath interference during the procedure or by pushing, pulling and torqueing of the device in a tortuous anatomy or a heavily calcified lesion.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the outer liner of the device peeled and difficulty removing occurred.A 2.4mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for an atherectomy procedure in the heavily calcified superficial femoral artery (sfa).During the procedure, the jetstream catheter had difficulty to cross the lesion.When the physician attempted to remove the device, he did not hit the rex button immediately and experienced resistance when removing the device from the patient.At that point, the physician hit the rex button and the device would not completely activate in rex and he had to remove the system from the patient without rex.The rex would not engage or advance the sheath.There was difficult to remove the catheter through the non-bsc sheath, it was pulled the sheath and catheter together.Upon visual inspection of the device, it was noticed that the clear protective covering at the distal end of the jetstream catheter had sheared and was prohibiting the catheter from being removed from the patient.The procedure was completed with a balloon angioplasty.There were no patient complications reported and the patient's status post procedure was stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JETSTREAM XC
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORK LIMITED
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key9272972
MDR Text Key168281055
Report Number2134265-2019-13330
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier08714729889922
UDI-Public08714729889922
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/04/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/29/2021
Device Model Number45007
Device Catalogue Number45007
Device Lot Number0023422100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/29/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2019
Initial Date FDA Received11/04/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-