Model Number 284580 |
Device Problem
Pressure Problem (3012)
|
Patient Problems
Extravasation (1842); Swelling (2091); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Initial reporter is company representative.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a shoulder surgery on an unknown date, the fms duo machine was set to 40 and the surgeon noticed that pressure went up to between 60-70 but the device was still showing 40.The surgeon also noticed swelling in the patient's shoulder.The staff was not sure if there was a sound alarm but they were able to visually see alarm.The procedure was able to be completed by reducing the pressure.There was no surgical delay reported.This is report 1 of 1 for pc-(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : the device was sent to the service center for evaluation.The repair report indicates that the unit failed the initial transducer pressure tests.The transducer was replaced to correct the problem.This complaint can be confirmed.The defective transducer is the root cause of this failure.The pump is over six years old.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device serial number on 12-19-2019, and no non-conformances related to the failure were identified.No further information regarding the cause of the defect has been provided to help determine the actual root cause for this failure.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from the affiliate reported the device has been returned, fixed, and then sent back to the account.The affiliate could not report the actual date of the incident.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: event description.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|