|
The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Visual inspection: the 2.5mm ti elastic nail 440mm (p/n 475.925 s/n 11l3767) was received at customer quality, and upon visual inspection, it was observed that a portion of the nail was broken off and missing.It is clearly sheared off and thus, the complaint condition is confirmed.Device failure/ defect identified? yes.Dimensional inspection: the shaft ø 2.5 mm of the nail proximal to breakage got measured.Diameter: d = ø 2.5 +0.03 /- 0.07mm.Caliper: ca 818.Measured rod diameter = ø 2.49 mm.Conclusion: the measuring result does show conformity.The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of this device.Document/ specification review: relevant drawing(s) was reviewed: a review of the manufacturing record evaluations was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Complaint confirmed? yes.Dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of 2.5mm ti elastic nail was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformances noted.The lot quantity met all-dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the device history record for the raw material revealed no complaint related anomalies the device history record shows this lot met all requirements at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Investigation conclusion: a definitive assignable root cause for the post-manufacturing damage could not be determined based on the provided information.This complaint is confirmed however no product design issues or manufacturing discrepancies that would contribute to the reported complaint condition were identified during this investigation.No new, unique or different patient harms were identified because of this evaluation.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|