Title : comparison of minimally invasive techniques in tongue base surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Author : mehmet ali babademez, md1, mehmet yorubulut, md2, muge fethiye yurekli, md1, emre gunbey, md1, selcan baysal, md1, baran acar, md1, and riza murat karas¸ en, md1 citation: otolaryngology¿head and neck surgery 145(5) 858¿864; doi: 10.1177/0194599811414793.The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the effectiveness and morbidity of 3 microinvasive tongue base surgical procedures combined with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (uppp) in supine-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (osa) patients.Between november 2009 and may 2010, 45 patients (male=40, female=15; mean age 48.2 ± 7.1 years, age range 41-60 years) underwent uppp in which the patients were divided in 3 groups; 15 patients were in low-temperature bipolar radiofrequency (ltbr) group, 15 patients were in submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision with radiofrequency (smile-r) group and 15 patients were in submucosal minimally invasive lingual excision with a harmonic scalpel (smile-h) group.During the procedure, eight 3-cm submucosal tunnels were created, beginning from the anterior through the vallecula in the midline of the posterior one third of the tongue using the ultracision harmonic scalpel (ethicon) hand probe.These tunnels were then joined using the harmonic scalpel again, and tissue ablation was performed in the tongue base.Reported complication in smile-h group included hemorrhage approximately 100 cc of which requiring bleeding control.The same patient experienced hypoglossal nerve paralysis due to edema, and speech impairment occurred in the postoperative period.The paralysis healed completely in 3 weeks with steroid therapy.In conclusion, when the polysomnography findings and mri were evaluated, uppp + smile-r were found to be more effective.No significant difference was found between the 3 techniques when morbidity and complications were compared.
|