|
The device, intended for use in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.A photo was provided but the failure could not be confirmed.The explants remain assembled together.The device was manufactured in 2017.A review of the device history records for the listed batch did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the complaint history for the listed part revealed no prior complaints for the listed failure mode with the same batch number.A review of risk management files and instructions for use found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.Our clinical/medical team noted: review of the provided operative report did not reveal any information surrounding the reported ¿jump phenomenon¿, which resulted in the rt tha revision.Additionally, there was no details provided for the post-operative left hip lumbosciatalgia and pain.Without additional supporting relevant medical records, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|