| Model Number |
130-28-50 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cyst(s) (1800); Failure of Implant (1924); No Code Available (3191); Muscle/Tendon Damage (4532); Bursitis (4832)
|
| Date of Event |
10/29/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pending evaluation.(concomitant device(s): femoral head 28 (cn: 142-28-00 / sn; (b)(4)) , vastago element (cn: 164-01-10 / sn: (b)(4)), crown cup 46mm (cn: 180-11-46 / sn: 2067133).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Premature wear of polyethylene.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: (h3) the evaluation noted that the reason for the revision reported may have been the result of edge loading/impingement and/or patient conditions which led to prosthesis wear.However, this cannot be confirmed because the component was not returned for evaluation.(d11) concomitant device(s): femoral head 28 (cn: (b)(4), sn; (b)(6).Vastago element (cn: (b)(4), sn; (b)(6).Crown cup 46mm (cn: (b)(4), sn; (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: a3, b5, d6b, h6 (clinical code, impact code, component code, investigation codes) the device was not returned for analysis.Investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received that the patient experienced bursitis, cyst, and rupture of a tendon.It was confirmed that the hip was subsequently revised.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: h3: based on the available information, the patient involved meets the following risk criteria for early prosthesis wear/osteolysis as specified in the hhe: combination of largest available femoral head and/or thinnest available acetabular liner was used, and implanted with a component having a shelf age of greater than 2 years.The most likely cause for the revision reported due to early prosthesis wear is a combination of the risk factors specified in an hhe.The prosthesis wear was able to be confirmed from the provided radiograph.H6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusion).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|