| Model Number |
PRB35-05-120-120 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
11/14/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Physician implanted a protege everflex stent in little calcified and moderately tortuous mid popliteal vessel with 80% stenosis.The device was used along with 6mm spider fx.The device was prepped per the ifu.It was reported that during removal of delivery system after stent deployment, the tip detached in the sheath and was captured using a snare.Stent was deployed correctly but the tip of catheter came off after deployment.It was pulled back into the sheath and was able to snare it with no issues.The lesion was not pre dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent and no resistance encountered when advancing the device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: the spider fx was removed from the patient without issue.There were no unintended consequences to patient.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis : the protégé everflex was returned within a blue biohazard pouch.No ancillary devices, cine, images or procedure notes were returned for evaluation.The distal inner observed within the outer sheath.A kink was noted on the outer sheath.The deployment paddle was engaged to advance the distal inner out of the outer sheath.The distal tip was detached from the distal inner.The distal tip was not returned to analysis lab a kink was observed on the distal inner just proximal of the retainer.No abnormalities were noted on the retainer.Dried blood was observed on the distal end of the catheter.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|