|
Medtronic received information that there was a non-detachment issue with the axium implant coil.The physician did not attempt to detach the coil with the instant detacher (id).They attempted to detach the coil with the manual method (breaking of the hypo-tube, an alternative detachment method presented in the instructions for use) 3 (three) times but without success.No patient injury was reported as a result of the event.The patient was undergoing embolization treatment of an unruptured fusiform aneurysm with a 6.5mm diameter.The patient's blood flow was normal and the vasculature was normal in tortuosity.The doctor didn't prepare the instant detacher (id) before the surgery.Used microcatheter to deliver the spring coil.A headway17 ( microvention) was used.No damage was noted to the pushwire.The patient was being treated for an unruptured, fusiform, basilar artery, dissecting aneurysm.The max diameter was 6.5mm.The blood flow and the vessel anatomy were both normal.No patient injury occurred.
|
|
D10: device available for evaluation - additional information g4.Date mfr rec ¿ additional information h2: type of follow up - device evaluation h3: device evaluated by manufacturer- additional information h6: codes updated the axium coil was returned for analysis.The actuator interface (ai) crimps and coupler tube were present and intact.The positive load indicator and break indicator were still intact.No evidence of mechanical or manual detachment attempt was found.The coin was present at the lumen stop.The implant coil was still attached to the pushwire.No damage was found with the shield coil.An in-house instant detacher was then used to detach the axium coil.The implant coil was successfully detached on the first attempt.No other anomalies were observed.Based on the analysis performed, the report of ¿non-detach¿ was confirmed as the axium coil was returned with the implant coil was still attached to the pushwire.However, the root cause could not be determined as the returned axium coil was successfully detached on the first attempt using an-house instant detacher.In addition, no damages were found with the returned axium coil.The reported that "the physician did not attempt to detach the coil with the instant detacher (id).The physician attempted to detach the coil with the manual method." however, no evidence of either method was attempted.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|