|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh ip on (b)(6) 2015.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol sepramesh ip.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7,d3, d4 (catalog no, lot no, udi, expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g1, g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh ip on (b)(6) 2015.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol sepramesh ip.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with incisional ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of sepramesh ip.Per operative notes, ¿a large hernia sac was identified and dissected free.The adhesions were lysed.A sepramesh ip was placed using prolene sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with abdominal wall abscess thereby underwent open repair with drainage of abdominal wall abscess.Per operative notes, ¿the abscess cavity was identified and opened.Significant amount of pus was removed.The prior mesh was noted.Abscess cavity was drained.¿ (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with abdominal wall abscess thereby underwent open repair with drainage of abdominal wall abscess.Per operative notes, ¿the abscess pocket was noted near the mesh.The abscess cavity was drained.¿ (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with infected mesh thereby underwent open repair with partial excision of sepramesh ip.Per operative notes, ¿the unincorporated edges of mesh were identified and removed.¿ (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with infected wound and mesh protrusion thereby underwent repair with excision of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿large amount of yellowish green fluid was drained.The protruded mesh was removed.The sepramesh ip was excised.Wound vac was placed.¿.
|