Lot number is unknown.Therefore, the 510-k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Concomitant medical products: unknown.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the manufacturing records cannot be reviewed as the lot/batch number has not been provided.(b)(4).
|
Title: early experience of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal.Hysterectomy (coelio-schauta) versus abdominal radical.Hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.Author : evangelos papacharalabous & anil tailor & thumuluru madhuri & theo giannopoulos & simon butler-manuel.Citation: gynecol surg (2009); 6:113¿117.Doi: 10.1007/s10397-008-0424-8.The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (larvh) vs.Abdominal radical hysterectomy (rh) for early-stage cervical cancer.This retrospective review involves all larvh for cervical cancer between january 2003 and june 2006 after introduction of larvh as a new procedure.During this period, 14 female patients (mean age: 38.6 years; age range: 25-81 years) underwent larvh.The operation results were compared with 12 female patients (mean age: 43.5 years; age range: 27-76 years) who underwent rh during the same period of time for cervical cancer.Pelvic lymph node dissection was done systematically using standardized technique.Ultracision harmonic scalpel (ethicon) was used throughout the laparoscopic cases that facilitated pelvic lymphadenectom.Ultracision harmonic scalpel (ethicon) was the primary instrument in all larvhs.Reported complications in the larvh group included intraoperative blood loss (mean: 725ml; range: 100-2000) (n-?), bladder perforation/cystotomies (n-2) which was repaired transvaginally, ureteric injury (n-1) and obturator nerve injury (n-1) in which all these injuries were repaired laparoscopically, unilateral neurapraxia of the obturator nerve (n-1), short-term urinary retention (n-1) in which the patient had to be discharged from the hospital with urinary catheter in situ for 10 days, unilateral thigh muscular atrophy following intraoperative injury to the obturator nerve (n-1), thigh paraesthesia and numbness (n-2), presumably due to inadvertent injury of lateral branches of the genitofemoral nerve, during lymphadenectomy, recurrent urinary tract infections (n-1) and adhesion (n-1) in which the patient underwent laparoscopic adhesiolysis.In conclusion, both larvh and rh appeared equally efficacious in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer with no recurrences in either group, in contrast to other published data.A copy of this literature article is attached to this medwatch report.
|