|
The associated devices, used in treatment, were returned and evaluated.The lab analysis included only visual observations.The femoral head exhibited an area of scoring on the articulating surface.For this to occur the head had to encounter a metal object.It is possible the head made metal contact during the reduction.The report notes the liner component had to be cut out in order to remove it.Visually this is confirmed.This indicates the liner was securely locked in place.Further examination revealed another cut across the polyethylene rim of the inner component.It is not clear why this had to be cut.From the provided information, conclusions as to why this issue occurred cannot be made.The medical investigation concluded that, per the lab retrieval analysis, ¿conclusions as to why this issue occurred cannot be made¿.It is unknown if the reported ¿tight hip¿, lack of an audible head reduction or implant positioning could have contributed to the reported repeated dislocations and revision to alternative components as reportedly the lateralized +4mm liner with a 36mm head ¿was stable and the surgery continued.¿ the patient impact beyond the reported events could not be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batches.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.Some potential probable causes of this event could include poor device positioning or selection.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|