Visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.Visual observations noted several kinks found throughout the device.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation determined the reported difficulty appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.It may be likely that the balloon rupture is the result of interaction with anatomy or associated devices.The noted kinks on the inner and outer member likely occurred during handling of the device post procedure, reinserting the device in the dispenser coil for return or interacting with the anatomy.There is no indication of product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design and labeling.
|