|
An event regarding dislocation involving a trident liner was reported.The event was confirmed through clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: not performed as no product was returned for evaluation.The reported device remains implanted.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: translated office notes state on (b)(6) 2014, ¿luxation of the right hip; closed reduction; six weeks of a brace¿.The note states, ¿control over five years ¿ no new complications.¿ on (b)(6) 2019 the patient was admitted with luxation of the right hip prosthesis.It was ¿repositioned under general anesthesia and ¿ home today.¿ x-ray printouts include a series dated (b)(6) 2014, which is an ap of the right hip demonstrating an uncemented right total hip arthroplasty with no screws in the acetabulum.The hip is reduced and the components are in nominal position.An x-ray dated (b)(6) 2019 at 09:01 am is an ap of the right hip demonstrating a dislocated right total hip arthroplasty, and an x-ray on (b)(6) 2019 at 11:50 am is an ap of the right total hip arthroplasty, reduced in nominal position with no pathology noted and no significant changes from the (b)(6) 2014 x- ray.After five years and five months in situ, the right total hip arthroplasty dislocated twice, once early post-operative and the second time after five years and five months in situ.Both were successfully reduced closed under general anesthesia.The circumstances of the events are not documented, but there is no evidence that factors associated with implant design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for these clinical events.-device history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there has been one other event for the lot referenced.(b)(4) relates to the same patient who had previous closed reduction for dislocation therefore no additional trending is required.Conclusion: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: translated office notes state on (b)(6) 2014, ¿luxation of the right hip; closed reduction; six weeks of a brace¿.The note states, ¿control over five years ¿ no new complications.¿ on (b)(6) 2019 the patient was admitted with luxation of the right hip prosthesis.It was ¿repositioned under general anesthesia and ¿ home today.¿ x-ray printouts include a series dated (b)(6) 2014, which is an ap of the right hip demonstrating an uncemented right total hip arthroplasty with no screws in the acetabulum.The hip is reduced and the components are in nominal position.An x-ray dated (b)(6) 2019 at 09:01 am is an ap of the right hip demonstrating a dislocated right total hip arthroplasty, and an x-ray on (b)(6) 2019 at 11:50 am is an ap of the right total hip arthroplasty, reduced in nominal position with no pathology noted and no significant changes from the (b)(6) 2014 x- ray.After five years and five months in situ, the right total hip arthroplasty dislocated twice, once early post-operative and the second time after five years and five months in situ.Both were successfully reduced closed under general anesthesia.The circumstances of the events are not documented, but there is no evidence that factors associated with implant design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for these clinical events.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|