| Model Number |
1896-5050S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
| Date of Event |
10/31/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.Customer does not want an investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The surgeon reported that he was undertaking a femoral nail (t2 gtn) procedure.A non-stryker nail was being revised and there was a gap in the fracture site.The surgeon undertook a 'slapping back' procedure in which he inserted the distal screws through the nail and then slapped the nail through the fracture site to reduce the fracture.The proximal locking screws were inserted without issue.The surgeon then noticed on the final distal x-ray that one of the screws had snapped, which the surgeon attributed to the 'process', rather than the screw quality.The surgeon removed half of the screw and inserted another over the top.There was a 5-minute delay while he removed the screw and replaced it.There were no other adverse consequences for the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidence was provided.A device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned, and no other evidence was provided for investigation.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.However, the event description (¿the surgeon then noticed on the final distal x-ray that one of the screws had snapped, which the surgeon attributed to the 'process', rather than the screw quality¿) indicates towards a rather unconventional procedure leading to the breakage of the screw as suggested by the operating surgeon rather than any deficiency in the screw itself.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The surgeon reported that he was undertaking a femoral nail (t2 gtn) procedure.A non-stryker nail was being revised and there was a gap in the fracture site.The surgeon undertook a 'slapping back' procedure in which he inserted the distal screws through the nail and then slapped the nail through the fracture site to reduce the fracture.The proximal locking screws were inserted without issue.The surgeon then noticed on the final distal x-ray that one of the screws had snapped, which the surgeon attributed to the 'process', rather than the screw quality.The surgeon removed half of the screw and inserted another over the top.There was a 5-minute delay while he removed the screw and replaced it.There were no other adverse consequences for the patient.Additionally reported: confirmation received that half of the screw was left in the patient.Indication for implant usage: 3.2.A non union.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|