|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, weight, race, ethnicity, and medical history were not provided.Procode: krd/hcg.The initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The email address of the initial reporter is not available.Physical manufacturer name: codman and shurtleff inc., dba depuy synthes products, inc.(b)(4).[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during an emergent coil embolization procedure targeting an aneurysm at the anterior communicating artery (acom), the 4mm x 10cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120410 / l13245) was the second coil used but there was resistance between the coil and the headway® 17 microcatheter (microvention-terumo); there was also resistance during the advancement of the coil through the microcatheter, though the timing of when this occurred was not available.There was no resistance between the guidewire and the microcatheter when the physician was accessing the target site.The physician attempted to pull the coil out, but the coil became unraveled.The complaint coil and the concomitant microcatheter were removed as a result.It was reported that continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter.There was no flow restriction / reduction as a result of the reported event.The procedure was completed with other products.There was no report of patient adverse event or complication, and no clinically significant procedure delay as a result of the reported issue.Based on complaint information, the device was not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (l13245) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information provided but without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the device history record review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.The exact cause of the event could not be conclusively determined; however, it is possible that circumstances of the procedure and / or device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an emergent coil embolization procedure targeting an aneurysm at the anterior communicating artery (acom), the 4mm x 10cm galaxy g3 xsft coil (glx120410 / l13245) was the second coil used but there was resistance between the coil and the headway® 17 microcatheter (microvention-terumo); there was also resistance during the advancement of the coil through the microcatheter, though the timing of when this occurred was not available.There was no resistance between the guidewire and the microcatheter when the physician was accessing the target site.The physician attempted to pull the coil out, but the coil became unraveled.The complaint coil and the concomitant microcatheter were removed as a result.It was reported that continuous flush had been maintained through the microcatheter.There was no flow restriction / reduction as a result of the reported event.The procedure was completed with other products.There was no report of patient adverse event or complication, and no clinically significant procedure delay as a result of the reported issue.
|