| Catalog Number |
0123113 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Unspecified Infection (1930); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
11/12/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix e/x.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix e/x.As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix e/x.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix e/x.As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of composix e/x mesh.Per op notes, ¿two old mesh were identified on left and right side.The mesh on the left was pulled away was excised.The mesh on the right side was intact.The hernia defect was with incarcerated omentum and colon was reduced.A composix e/x mesh was placed and tacked using prolene sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with multiple recurrent incisional hernias thereby underwent open repair with partial excision of composix e/x mesh and implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, ¿the prior mesh was identified to be detached from the abdominal wall.The adhesions of mesh to the loops of small bowel were lysed.A portion of old mesh was excised.The hernia sacs were identified and excised.A synthetic mesh was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient had incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of unknown mesh.(b)(6) 2016 ¿ abdominal abscess drainage under ct guidance.(b)(6) 2016 - debridement of left upper quadrant abdominal wall abscess (b)(6) 2016 - exploration of abdominal wall with removal of infected mesh.(b)(6) 2017 - patient had recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of unknown mesh.(b)(6) 2017 - partial explant of exposed non-incorporated mesh.(b)(6) 2018 - patient had recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of unknown biological mesh.(b)(6) 2019 - interventional radiology guided drainage of abdominal wall abscess.(b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with chronic wounds thereby underwent open repair with removal of sutures.Per op notes, ¿the prolene sutures in the wound base was removed.The wound was packed with iodoform gauze.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with chronic wound thereby underwent open repair with removal of remanent sutures.Per op notes, ¿the remanent sutures and the tissues were removed and sutured.The wound was packed with dressing.¿ (b)(6) 2021 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with removal of composix e/x, synthetic mesh and implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, ¿adhesions were lysed.The infected composix e/x mesh and synthetic mesh was excised entirely.The hernia defect was identified and repaired with synthetic mesh and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2021 - patient was diagnosed with draining sinus wound thereby underwent open repair with wound vac placement.Per op notes, ¿the wound was explored and placement of wound vac.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jan-2012) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|