• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 0 HOLE ACET SHELL 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 0 HOLE ACET SHELL 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS Back to Search Results
Model Number 71331852
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Aspiration/Inhalation (1725)
Event Date 02/24/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that mri demonstrated mild diffuse fatty infiltration.Right hip aspiration was performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The devices, used in treatment, were not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.A clinical evaluation indicated that his pain is most likely associated with adverse reaction to his prosthesis; most likely with the modular neck.Elevations in metal ion levels, effusion, and hypertrophy of the synovium are consistent with findings associated with an armd.Without the pre-revision x-rays, it cannot be determined whether the greater trochanter fracture occurred pre-revision, or as a result of using the mallet.Without post-implantation x-rays to determine initial anatomical placement and any micro-motion over time, it cannot be ruled out the undersized femoral component and its varus position as contributory factors; as well as the noted modular neck, which the surgeon suspects as the source for the metal debris.Without the supporting lab/pathology results, imaging, and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause of the reported reactions cannot be confirmed, nor concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implants.A complaint history review found related failures; this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the device history records for the listed batches did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.Factors and/or potential causes that could contribute to the reported event have been identified as undersized femoral component, varus, incorrect materials, and material composition.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaints will be reopened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 0 HOLE ACET SHELL 52MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks road
memphis TN 38116
MDR Report Key9409351
MDR Text Key169016209
Report Number1020279-2019-04274
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBL
UDI-Device Identifier03596010597595
UDI-Public03596010597595
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K070756
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/18/2021
Device Model Number71331852
Device Catalogue Number71331852
Device Lot Number11LM10890
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/07/2019
Initial Date FDA Received12/04/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/19/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/26/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
-
-