|
|
| Catalog Number |
0117320 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Emotional Changes (1831); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
05/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges past, present and future damages, pain and suffering and permanent injury, however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol 3d max light (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol 3d max mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3d max and an unspecified bard/davol 3d max light on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged the patient had unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3d max and an unspecified bard/davol 3d max light on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged the patient had unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2018 ¿ patient was diagnosed with large right indirect inguinal hernia, left pantaloon inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of 3dmax mesh (left ¿ device 1), 3dmax light mesh (right ¿ device 2).Per op notes, ¿on left side, a direct and indirect hernia defects containing preperitoneal fat were noted.A medium sized 3dmaxt mesh (device 1 was placed to cover indirect and direct spaces and secured with tacks to iliopubic tract.On right side, a large indirect hernia sac with scrotal component was identified.A large 3dmax light mesh (device 2) was place and fixated with tacks to iliopubic tract.¿ (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient had pain and was diagnosed with left recurrent inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted repair with the removal of tacks.Per op notes, ¿on right, the plane was developed between the inferior edge of the mesh (device 2) and peritoneum.Ample scar tissue was noted.The lateral tacks were removed from portion of mesh (device 2) tacked down to iliopubic tract.On left, direct space had a fat containing hernia was reduced.The mesh (device 1) was found to be folded down.A synthetic mesh was placed into preperitoneal space using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient had pain in right groin thereby provided medications.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges past, present and future damages, pain and suffering and permanent injury, however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b2, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., expiry date, udi no.), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol - 3dmax light mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - 3dmax mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|