| Catalog Number |
1201015 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abdominal Pain (1685); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Seroma (2069); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
06/12/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol phasix mesh on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol phasix mesh.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol phasix mesh on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device(s).As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol phasix mesh.As reported, the attorney alleges patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2018 ¿ the patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic combined open repair with implant of two phasix st mesh (device #1 and device #2).Per operative notes, ¿ the bowel was seen adhered to the old mesh.A phasix st mesh (device #1) was placed and sutured.Over the superior defect, laparoscopically another phasix st mesh (device #2) was placed and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2018 - the patient was diagnosed with seroma and allergic reaction, abdominal pain thereby underwent open repair with explant of mesh (device #1 and device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the odour free exudate was aspirated and mesh (device #1 and device #2) was removed.The allergic mesh reaction and seroma was removed and stapled.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct pma/510(k) #.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the phasix st mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the phasix st mesh (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|