The cause for the discordant afp result is unknown.Siemens healthcare diagnostics is investigating.The warning section of the instructions for use states: "warning the concentration of afp in a given specimen, as determined by assays from different manufacturers, can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity.The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the afp assay used.Values obtained with different afp assay methods cannot be used interchangeably.Before changing assay methods, the laboratory must do the following: for prenatal testing, the laboratory must establish a range of normal values for the new assay based on normal serum and amniotic fluid from pregnant women with a confirmed gestational age.For cancer management, the laboratory must perform additional testing to confirm baseline values for patients being serially monitored.United states federal law restricts this device to sale and distribution by or on the order of a physician, or to a clinical laboratory; and use is restricted to, by, or on the order of a physician.Use afp results only as part of the overall clinical evaluation of a patient.Do not use afp results as the only criterion for diagnosis." the interpretation of results section of the instructions for use states: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with patient's medical history, clinical presentation and other findings.".
|
Mdr 1219913-2019-00254 was filed on december 5, 2019 reporting the customer observation of an elevated advia centaur cp afp result compared to repeat testing of the sample.The customer stated that the initial result was not reported to the physician.The test was part of a physical examination.The sample was drawn in a coagulation-promoting vacuum tube.Siemens reviewed the error log and checked for air bubbles in the tubing.The wash station pump was replaced.An aspirate bubble detector calibration was performed.Qc results were within range.The system is performing acceptable.With the information provided to date, siemens cannot determine if the sample was drawn correctly allowing a full clot to form.A single high result is likely not caused by the instrument and is most likely attributed to preanalytical handling.Siemens reviewed internal release data for reagent lots ending in 211 and no issues were identified.No product nonconformance was identified and the customer has not reported any further discrepancies.No further investigation is required.
|