H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review was conducted and it was determined that a device history record review was not required.Investigation summary: the device and one electronic photo were returned for evaluation.The photo shows the distal half of a pta balloon.The distal area of the balloon circled.The balloon appears to be slightly larger near the distal tip, but it is unable to be confirmed due to the quality of the photo.Based on the photo review, no confirmations can be made.A visual inspection was performed and no anomalies were noted to the device.The device was not inflated due to the user puncturing the balloon.The balloon was cut to expose the device inflation/deflation ports, and no anomalies were noted to the inflation/deflation ports.No further functional testing was performed.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported inflation issue, deflation issue, and retraction issue, as the device was unable to be tested due to the user puncturing the balloon.It is possible the reported deflation issue contributed to the reported retraction issue.However, the definitive root cause for the reported inflation issue, deflation issue, and retraction issue could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient or procedural issues contributed to the event.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.H11: h3, h6 (results, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|