|
Ec method code desc - 5: communication/interviews (4111).Investigation ¿ evaluation.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows one other complaint associated with the complaint device lot.The one other complaint was reported for a similar issue from a different customer.There is not enough evidence to conclude that there was an issue with other devices in the lot.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: caution: this device is conductive.Avoid contact with any electrified instrument.Caution: sterile if the package is unopened or undamaged.Do not use if package is broken.Caution: federal (u.S.A.) law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician.Important: enclose device in sheath before removing from tray/holder.Important: excessive force could damage device.Store in a dark, cool, dry place.No product was returned.No photos were provided.A search of the north american distribution center (nadc) database found all devices from the complaint lot have been shipped.Therefore, no similar product from the same lot is available for investigation.Another complaint was reported from the same lot from a different customer and that device was returned.It was found that the basket of that device would fully open, but would not fully close.A gap in the basket wires was noted when the handle was in the closed position.Cook has concluded that a manufacturing deficiency contributed to this incident.A corrective action has been taken to fix this issue, however it was implemented after this device was manufactured and shipped.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|