The reason for this revision surgery was reported as bearing wear.The actual length of in-vivo for the item listed is unknown as the original surgery date was not provided or could be established.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.The revised item was not returned for examination and the item and lot number was not provided.To adequately investigate this event, the part and lot number is necessary.If this information is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.
|