| Model Number |
G38490 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
11/12/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Reported by the dm via complaint communication form- the stent would only deploy about 2/3 and the thumbwheel would not completely deploy the stent.They had to break up the white cartridge and manually deliver the stent by manipulating the wire/catheter.The stent was somewhat "scrunched" and they lined it with viabahn.Post arterialgram showed a patent vessel.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Reported by the dm via complaint communication form the stent would only deploy about 2/3 and the thumbwheel would not completely deploy the stent.They had to break up the white cartridge and manually deliver the stent by manipulating the wire/catheter.The stent was somewhat "scrunched" and they lined it with viabahn.Post arterialgram showed a patent vessel.Fda mdr reporting required: this event meets the criteria of an fda ¿serious injury¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿ section 2.13 and 2.15 as they did have to provide a different treatment by utilizing a covered stent also reportable based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of ¿stent kinking during implantation'.No adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occurring.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Reported by the dm via complaint communication form- the stent would only deploy about 2/3 and the thumbwheel would not completely deploy the stent.They had to break up the white cartridge and manually deliver the stent by manipulating the wire/catheter.The stent was somewhat "scrunched" and they lined it with viabahn.Post arterialgram showed a patent vessel.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: the zisv6-35-125-7-120-ptx device of lot number c1477111 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation was conducted.Three attempts have been made to obtain additional information regarding this event.However, at the time of the investigation, a response had not yet been received.The investigation will be updated in the future should any additional information or imaging be received.Document review: prior to distribution zisv6-35-125-7-120-ptx devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for zisv6-35-125-7-120-ptx of lot number c1477111 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records, confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1477111.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0118-5) states the following: ¿do not use excessive force to deploy the stent.If excessive resistance is felt when beginning deployment, remove the delivery system without deploying the stent and replace with a new device.¿ root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to difficult patient anatomy.It is possible that the patient¿s anatomy was somewhat tortuous or calcified which may have resulted in resistance during advancement and or attempted deployment.A difficult patient anatomy may have caused or contributed to resistance during deployment which may have prevented the user from completely deploying the stent using the thumbwheel on the device.From the information provided it is known that the user disassembled the handle of the device to manually deploy the stent.It is possible that this resulted in the stent deploying sub-optimally contributing to the need for placement of the viabahn stent.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient required placement of a viabahn stent during the same procedure as a result of this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|