| Model Number |
214120 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Disconnection (1171)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
11/25/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).The lot number is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate, via complaint submission tool, during a shoulder bankhardt labrum repair, the surgeon inserted one 8.5x75 yellow cannula 214120 into the shoulder and one of the rubber dams collapsed into the cannula body.It was reported the surgeon removed the cannula and inserted another one.The surgeon reportedly removed all fragments with ease and did not require additional surgical intervention.No patient harm, consequences, or surgical delay were reported.The surgeon commented to the affiliate that this was the second or third 8.5x75 yellow cannula to do this within a couple weeks.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Lot #: the lot number was documented as unknown in the initial report and has been updated as (b)(4).Therefore udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary = > the device was received and inspected.Upon visual inspection of the device it is observed that the first silicone dam is detached and is missing from its location.This dam was not returned to customer quality unit.The complaint is confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure could be attributed to excess force being applied to pass instruments through the cannula which would cause the silicone dam to detach.This failure can be attributed to user technique.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [1906058] number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history lot = > a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [1906058] number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary the complaint device is not being returned, multiples attempts for product return were made with no response, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [(b)(4)] number, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If the device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|