Preliminary review of the logs led to the conclusion that the pba a500 blower and the blower unit m3 needed to be replaced.The replaced parts and the electronic log file were submitted for further analysis.The returned components were assembled in a lab device.Within a 7 days test run using different modes and settings and incl.A daily system test, the reported symptom couldn¿t be reproduced.However, the case in question could be reconstructed by means of the information stored in the electronic log file.At 1:46pm on the reported date of event, the perseus a500 detected an unexpected deviation within the blower control.A corresponding visible and audible torbovent 2 failure alarm was generated.In case of such failure fresh gas delivery will be continued and manual ventilation remains available to continue the case.The relevant parts were replaced.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|