|
A valiant stent graft system was implanted in a patient for the endovascular treatment of a thoracic aortic aneurysm of unknown size.It was reported that approximately 2 years 8 months post index procedure, due to distal aortic dilation, a valiant navion stent graft was implanted as an extension.The distal dilation was not associated with the proximal device, but rather was associated with the distal valiant captivia vamc3430c150 ((b)(4)).The valiant navion stent graft was implanted as a distal extension of this device.The physician elected to implant endoanchors due to a possible type ia endoleak observed at the very proximal margin however it was noted that the endoleak did not appear to be filling the sac.It was reported that the physician stated there was a small evidence of contrast along the inner curve at the time of the original implant but the contrast wasn¿t evident in the aneurysm sac.They observed a small gap along the inner curve on the current ct, suggesting the value of securing the graft to the inner curve to mitigate endotension.The endoanchors were planned to be placed along the lesser curve of the aorta at the proximal margin of the prior valiant captivia implant distal to the lcc/lsa.As per the physician, the cause of the type ia endoleak was not confirmed.No additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient will be monitored.
|
|
Film evaluation summary: the exact cause of the reported events could not be determined from the films provided.The reported possible type ia endoleak was confirmed from the ct¿s from 30 months post-implant; however, the cause could not be determined.The pre-implant anatomy is unknown, images during implant were not provided, and earlier post-implant ct¿s were not provided for comparison.It is possible that disease progression (proximal neck dilatation) may have led to a poor proximal seal.No issues were seen with the distally implanted device.The cause of the inability of the applier to pass through the distal end of the guide could not be determined from the films provided.The reported dislodged endoanchor was confirmed.The cause of the dislodgment, reported as occurring during the second phase of deployment, could not be determined from the films provided.Images during implant of the endoanchors were not available for review.It is possible that this was anatomical related; implanting within irregular or eccentric thrombus, calcification, and/or plaque may compromise endoanchor penetration or fixation.Possible procedural related causes include not positioning the guide and applier 90° perpendicular to endograft, engaging areas of loose fabric or fabric not in apposition to the native vessel wall or engaging a stent, and not maintaining constant position, pressure and support throughout the endoanchor deployment sequence.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|