|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name and 510k number.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, d6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d1 (brand name), g4 (510k number).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st mesh on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with a large incisional hernia with loss of abdominal domain thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralight st mesh using echo ps.Per operative notes, ¿the ventralight st mesh using echo ps was placed and secured to the rectus muscles and the anterior abdominal wall fascia and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the previously placed ventralight st mesh using echo ps was removed and a piece of synthetic mesh was placed into defect and sutured to xiphoid.¿.
|