|
It was reported that during a thoracentesis procedure the micropuncture transitionless access set was unable to advance a wire, causing separation.The physician then felt resistance when they attempted to withdraw the wire and the tip broke off.It is unknown how far the wire had been advanced before it was withdrawn.The physician reported that the tip of the wire broke off in the pleural space, but does not believe it presents any danger to the patient.It is currently unknown how the procedure was completed, but the sales representative believes it was completed using another similar device.A cook sales representative spoke with the physician who stated they were planning to discharge the patient in a few days.It was reported that the patient did not experience any other adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.B5: corrected/additional information regarding the event.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event summary: it was reported that during a thoracentesis procedure the micropuncture transition less access set was unable to advance a wire, causing separation.The physician then felt resistance when they attempted to withdraw the wire and the tip broke off.The wire was reportedly manipulated and/or removed through the entry needle.It is unknown how far the wire had been advanced before it was withdrawn.The physician reported that the tip of the wire broke off in the pleural space but does not believe it presents any danger to the patient.It is currently unknown how the procedure was completed, but the sales representative believes it was completed using another similar device.A cook sales representative spoke with the physician who stated they were planning to discharge the patient in a few days.It was reported that the patient did not experience any other adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, specifications and quality control procedures of the device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned.Therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.No gaps were discovered in the manufacturing instructions, specifications, or quality control procedures for this device.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The product is packaged with instructions for use, which state, ¿do not withdraw the wire guide through the introducer needle; breakage may result.If the wire guide tip must be withdrawn while the needle is inserted, remove both the needle and the wire as a unit.¿ based on the information available, investigation has concluded that the most likely cause for this event was the withdrawal of the wire guide through the entry needle, contrary to the ifu.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|