• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA25 A.PRECHAMBER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA25 A.PRECHAMBER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX442T
Device Problems Infusion or Flow Problem (2964); Pressure Problem (3012)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 11/18/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Height: 110 cm.Date of implantation: 2012 (month and day unknown).Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the progav 2.0 valve is permeable.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 valve was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Result: first, we performed a visual inspection of the progav 2.0 valve.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability, and opening pressure of the valve, as well as the brake functionality and brake force.The progav 2.0 valve operates as expected and met all specifications.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of non-adjustability.At the time of our investigation, the progav 2.0 was able to be adjusted to all specified settings.However, it is possible that the deposits observed inside the valve could have caused the malfunction in the past.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a valve is not adjustable.The reporter indicated that a 2 year 4 month post operative valve is not adjusting.The device was explanted.Additional event details have not been provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA25 A.PRECHAMBER
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key9507830
MDR Text Key188560693
Report Number3004721439-2019-00288
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K141687
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/20/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/18/2022
Device Model NumberFX442T
Device Catalogue NumberFX442T
Device Lot Number20034546
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/21/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/24/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
Patient Weight36
-
-