|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned guide wire and the reported separation was confirmed.The reported prolapse was not confirmed due to the separation and distal end of the wire not returning.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents and/or complaints reported from this lot.There was no damage noted to the guide wire during the inspection prior to use which suggests a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling did not contribute to the reported difficulties.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to operational circumstances of the procedure.Based on the reported information, it is likely that during advancement through the anatomy, the guide wire prolapsed likely causing the tip to kink against the previously implanted stent.Manipulation during retraction ultimately resulted in the reported tip separation and subsequent noted damages to the coils and core.The reported patient effect of intimal dissection is listed in instructions for use as a known patient effect of coronary stenting procedures.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect(s) of pericardial effusion, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.However, the reported patient effects or intimal dissection and treatments appear to be related to the operational circumstances of the procedure, as the patient transferred to a different hospital and underwent major surgery to treat dissection, pericardial effusion and to retrieve the separated section of guide wire.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|