|
It was reported via journal article title: does ultrasonic energy for surgical dissection reduce the incidence of renal transplant lymphocele? author/s: e.W.Nelson, m.E.Gross, m.C.Mone, h.J.Hansen, x.Sheng, k.M.Cannon, and s.Alder.Citation: transplantation proceedings, 43, 3755¿3759 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.Transproceed.2011.08.079.This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the rate of posttransplant lymphocele development using ultrasonic dissection (ud) versus a historic review of lymphatic control using suture ligation.From january 1994 to december 2009, records of a total of 532 patients who received transplants were reviewed.Within this population, 259 cases had suture ligation and 273 cases (n= 58.2% males, mean age: 39.9 years) employed the use of ud.The ud equipment used in this study was the harmonic ace shears with a length of 23 cm (ethicon) to control lymphatic vessels.Complaints included lymphocele (n=9.2%).Treatment could be either aspiration alone, initial percutaneous drainage with eventual surgical drainage, or surgical drainage without attempted prior treatment with percutaneous aspiration.There was no statistically advantage to the use of ud for lymphatic control, based on this experience there is an obvious advantage in terms of speed and convenience when using this type of dissection.As secondary endpoints of our data, we found that younger patients, those receiving living donor transplants, and those who had repeat transplantations were at a higher risk for development of lymphoceles after renal transplantation.
|