|
|
| Model Number |
CL-906 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Radiation Exposure, Unintended (3164); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
11/15/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during laparoscopic surgery, while suturing the uterus, the surgeon thought that the needle was blunt, however on close inspection the tip was missing.An on-call consultant was called in and performed an abdominal and pelvic x-ray to make sure that the tip had not fallen into the body, which was not found.Surgical time was extended by 30 minutes or more due to the product condition.Another suture was opened to complete the case.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5, d10, g4, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of two devices.A tactile and microscopic inspection of the sealed suture was performed with no abnormalities.The visual inspection of the opened sample noted one partial suture and one partial needle.The needle was received broken and with the tip missing.Upon microscopic inspection, instrument marks were noted but not near the break site.Functionally, a bend moment test was performed on the sealed sample and the results met the specifications for this product.A review of the device history record indicates this product was released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.The investigation concluded there were no abnormalities that would have caused or contributed to the reported condition.A definitive root cause could not be determined with regard to the reported condition.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during laparoscopic surgery, while suturing the uterus, the surgeon thought that the needle was blunt, however on close inspection the tip was missing.An on-call consultant was called in and performed an abdominal and pelvic x-ray to make sure that the tip had not fallen into body, which was not found.Surgical time was extended by 30 minutes due to the product condition.Another suture was opened to complete the case.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|