• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH PFNA-II BLADE L100 TAN; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH PFNA-II BLADE L100 TAN; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04.027.055S
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Non-union Bone Fracture (2369)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device is not distributed in the united states but is similar to device marketed in the usa.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a patient had surgery on (b)(6) 2018, in (b)(6).The reduction and vertical line of a broken femur were within the standard range, and the postoperative condition was good (due to the protection of patient privacy in the hospital, it is not possible to provide postoperative x-rays ); the patient was discharged from the hospital for physical therapy.After he returned home it was discovered that the bone block was displaced.The doctor confirmed that the event was not related to product quality and/or surgical procedures and had communicated this to the patient.At the same time, the doctor contacted the patient to ask him to return to the hospital for the relevant referral surgery can be continued.The patient said that he is planning to stay in his country for treatment.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.D4: expire date provided for reporting.H3, h4, h6: a review of the device history record.Lot / part: 04.027.055s, lot: l355810, manufacturing site: bettlach, release to warehouse date: 28.Mar.2017, expiry date: 01.Mar.2027.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified h3, h6: investigation summary the complained pictures were forwarded to the medical safety officer for evaluation.Here the statement.This is a reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture, ao 31a3.3.It is one of the worst we have to deal with.The fracture appears to be fixed with a pfna ii unknown implant.The fracture is malreduced in about 35 degrees of varus.Provided medical record documents reveal that the index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2018.The ct scan report is reviewed in the clinic visit 18 months later, (b)(6) 2019.It was read as a nonunion in the report (not provided) and revision surgery was made a possibility.Indeed if the fracture was ununited at 18 months it meets the criteria for an established nonunion.The implant is able to manage the load before the nail, can only be provided externally via a medical information request.Provided the ct scan read is correct and there is a nonunion, implant failure is likely imminent meaning months, not years, this fracture could be healed considering how well the patient is doing or if ununited, dynamization could influence late union.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventive action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PFNA-II BLADE L100 TAN
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
MDR Report Key9530319
MDR Text Key188995223
Report Number8030965-2019-71533
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
UDI-Device Identifier07611819394247
UDI-Public(01)07611819394247
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,foreign,health profe
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/30/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04.027.055S
Device Lot NumberL355810
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/31/2019
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-