• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS; TORIC IOLS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS; TORIC IOLS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCT525
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Visual Impairment (2138); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/11/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age/date of birth: unknown, information not provided.Date of event: unknown, information not provided, but the best estimate date is during (b)(6) 2019.If implanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Reporter phone #: (b)(6).(b)(4).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported lens calculation was performed on the johnson & johnson (j&j) platform with indication for lithium zct450 diopter 23.0 intraocular lens (iol).Barrets calculator indicated a zct300 23.5 diopter iol, but the surgeon followed j&j calculator, and the patient¿s postoperative visual acuity is +1 -1.75(80).The doctor proposes an explant.User result says postoperative dissatisfaction with low acute vision.Additional information confirmed lens explant/exchanged for a model zct525 23.0 diopter lens based on the replacement lens serial number provided.Exchange was performed requiring incision enlargement without suturing.In the preoperative period, refraction was +1.00 -1.75 (80) with complaints, there was an inversion of the original axis due to the placement of a lens with greater astigmatism.Patient evolved well with refreshment (replacement lens) +0.25 -0.75 (170) with 20/15p vision.Redo calculations by barret calculator was successful with the original lens that was indicated by the (j&j) calculator.No further information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed because the product was not returned.The complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search revealed that no similar complaints were received for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are nr-(b)(4) and capa-010215.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS
Type of Device
TORIC IOLS
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key9532249
MDR Text Key182703251
Report Number9614546-2019-01136
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474589537
UDI-Public(01)05050474589537(17)230611
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
P980040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/05/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/30/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/11/2023
Device Model NumberZCT525
Device Catalogue NumberZCT5250230
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received10/25/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-