|
It was reported via literature entitled: day-case stapled (circular) vs.Diathermy hemorrhoidectomy, a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.Author/s: matti kairaluoma, m.D., ph.D., yosti nuorva, m.D., ph.D., ilmo kellokumpu, m.D., ph.D.Citation: dis colon rectum 2003; 46:93¿99.The aimed of this randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy and value of stapled hemorrhoidectomy with that of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in a day-case.Between april 1999 and august 2000, 60 patients were enrolled in the study in which 30 patients (male=19, female=11; mean age=48.5 years, age range=17-65 years) underwent diathermy hemorrhoidectomy and 30 patients (male=13, female=17; mean age=47 years, age range=25-65 years) stapled hemorrhoidectomy.The patients underwent either conventional hemorrhoidectomy with diathermy dissection and without pedicle ligation or stapled hemorrhoidectomy by means of the pph01 stapling device (ethicon).Reported complications included minor secondary bleeding from the staple line (n=2) on days 1 and 7 after surgery and was treated by adrenaline injection; anastomotic stenosis (n=1) and was treated by balloon dilatation; treatment failures (n=7) which necessitated subsequent treatments.In conclusion, stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a significantly less painful operation than diathermy hemorrhoidectomy but does not seem to offer significant advantages in terms of hospital stay or symptom control in the long term.Hemorrhoidectomy may improve symptoms of difficult rectal evacuation.
|